One post in full with excerpt

Codefragmenten

curl "https://api.oanor.com/substack-api/v1/post" \
  -H "x-oanor-key: oanor_test_..."

await fetch("https://api.oanor.com/substack-api/v1/post", {
  headers: { "x-oanor-key": "oanor_test_..." }
});

$ch = curl_init("https://api.oanor.com/substack-api/v1/post");
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, ["x-oanor-key: oanor_test_..."]);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, true);
$out = curl_exec($ch);

import requests
requests.get(
    "https://api.oanor.com/substack-api/v1/post",
    headers={"x-oanor-key": "oanor_test_..."}
)

Voorbeeldrespons

Een echte respons van dit endpoint, vastgelegd bij de laatste health check.

{
    "data": {
        "url": "https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/roundup-83-i-told-you-so",
        "slug": "roundup-83-i-told-you-so",
        "type": "newsletter",
        "title": "Roundup #83: I told you so!",
        "excerpt": "Photo by B. Sutherton via Wikimedia Commons Howdy, folks! Today’s roundup is mostly a bunch of follow-ups to posts I wrote before. It’s very hard to decide when to post about a particular topic, and it often happens that some relevant news story or piece of data comes out a little bit later. These roundups are a good way of cleaning up those loose ends. Today we start with a truly wacky policy proposal by the esteemed Thomas Piketty… 1. What on Earth is Thomas Piketty talking about? Unlike many people, I never pretended to have read Thomas Piketty’s book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century . I simply didn’t read it. I did read a number of the papers that the book was based on , which is often a better and quicker way of getting the key points of a book like that. I thought those papers were a good and important addition to the economics literature, even if the messy reality of inequality didn’t always fit the simple story Piketty told, and the data he relied on was less reliable than we might want. Despite the limitations of Piketty’s work, it sparked a long-overdue and generally healthy debate about inequality. And Piketty’s basic policy solution — tax rich people more — was pretty reasonable, even if his proposed numbers were too extreme. I did roll my eyes when Piketty stood on a stage at an academic convention and accused Greg Mankiw of being in the pocket of rich people. 1 But overall his work seemed pretty serious and often reasonable. However, after years of relative silence, Piketty has burst back onto the scene with some work that seems very un reasonable. He and his team at the World Inequality Lab — which includes his longtime co-authors Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman — have come out with a grand plan for fixing the world . And for the most part, it’s total nonsense. Piketty described the new plan in a thread on X. Its main focus, perhaps surprisingly, is not inequality — it’s climate change! First of all, Piketty’s baseline climate change scenarios ap",
        "is_paid": false,
        "audience": "everyone",
        "subtitle": "Piketty gets wacky; Tokenmaxxing fails; Trump, drones, and Ukraine; Tariffs on China, again; India's growth; Borjas again",
        "post_date": "2026-06-08T07:42:08.344Z",
        "reactions": 334,
        "wordcount": 3113,
        "like_count": 334,
        "cover_image": "https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!ltQ3!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F57ee2c9c-5a0f-48ad-b3b0-862053f1a953_960x640.jpeg",
        "publication": "noahpinion.substack.com",
        "comment_count": 51
    },
    "meta": {
        "timestamp": "2026-06-09T11:39:46.864Z",
        "request_id": "1dfdd83a-b88e-4ec7-ad18-807aff
…