Ground coverage ratio

Fragmentos de código

curl "https://api.oanor.com/pvspacing-api/v1/ground-coverage" \
  -H "x-oanor-key: oanor_test_..."

await fetch("https://api.oanor.com/pvspacing-api/v1/ground-coverage", {
  headers: { "x-oanor-key": "oanor_test_..." }
});

$ch = curl_init("https://api.oanor.com/pvspacing-api/v1/ground-coverage");
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, ["x-oanor-key: oanor_test_..."]);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, true);
$out = curl_exec($ch);

import requests
requests.get(
    "https://api.oanor.com/pvspacing-api/v1/ground-coverage",
    headers={"x-oanor-key": "oanor_test_..."}
)

Respuesta de ejemplo

Una respuesta real de este endpoint, capturada en la última comprobación de estado.

{
    "data": {
        "note": "Ground coverage ratio = the module length ÷ the row pitch, the fraction of the ground the modules would cover if laid flat — a packing-density measure. Typical fixed-tilt fields run 0.4–0.5 GCR; higher packs more capacity into the land but raises mutual shading and the diffuse-light loss, lower wastes land. Trackers and high latitudes use lower GCR; flat, low-latitude sites can go higher.",
        "inputs": {
            "row_pitch_m": 3.807,
            "module_length_m": 1.7
        },
        "ground_coverage_pct": 44.65,
        "ground_coverage_ratio": 0.4465
    },
    "meta": {
        "timestamp": "2026-06-07T08:17:56.583Z",
        "request_id": "1d9eb204-1ec4-4261-8fde-949eea47e7db"
    },
    "status": "ok",
    "message": "Ground coverage",
    "success": true
}